Partner Web3 launch page: static does not mean careless
A token information site, swap guidance, owner/contact visibility, and correcting deployment ownership before production — because who owns the deploy matters.
This was a static Vite site, which makes it easy to underestimate.
The work was still product work: visible owner and contact details, token education, market context, tokenomics, whitepaper delivery, swap guidance, and a clean deployment handoff.
The deployment issue
The most important part of this project was not a CSS tweak.
The site had to be linked to the client's Vercel project, not the wrong account. That meant checking the local Vercel project link, switching the active team, relinking to the existing client project, and deploying production from the correct scope.
Static sites still have operational ownership. If the wrong account owns the deploy, the client has a real maintenance problem even if the page looks right. They cannot roll back independently. They cannot update environment variables. They cannot add a collaborator. The product looks fine from the outside and is actually broken from the inside.
What I shipped
- token information and education
- swap-path guidance
- public launch copy
- whitepaper delivery
- visible owner and contact blocks
- production deploy through the client's project, not mine
The client details and private project settings stay private. What I can say is that delivery discipline matters on small projects just as much as large ones: make the visible copy clear, ship the build, and leave the client with the deployment in the right place.